suggested financing through its bank, but appellants preferred to use one of the banks they used locally. (hereinafter, A.W.D.) on or about December 5, 1972. The Rudisells contracted for installation of aluminum siding by Aluminum Wholesale Distributors, Inc. The District Court found for appellee on all claims. On cross-motions for summary judgment, the Magistrate made recommendations largely in favor of appellee, finding that appellee did violate TILA in one instance but that the damage claim was barred by the statute of limitations and appellants had no right to rescind. Appellee counterclaimed for judgment on the note. Appellants, James and Jeanette Rudisell, sued appellee, Fifth Third Bank, for rescission of a home improvement contract for aluminum siding and accompanying promissory note and for statutory damages for violations of the Truth in Lending Act, 15 U.S.C.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |